Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Environmental Geosciences

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mooney, F. D. Articles by Murray-Gulde, C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Constructed treatment wetlands for flue gas desulfurization waters: Full-scale design, construction issues, and performance

¹ ENTRIX, Inc., 50 Glenlake Parkway, Suite 600, Atlanta, Georgia 30328; dmooney{at}entrix.com
² ENTRIX, Inc., 50 Glenlake Parkway, Suite 600, Atlanta, Georgia 30328

F. Douglas Mooney is a senior project engineer for ENTRIX Inc. He received his B.S. degree in civil engineering from West Virginia University (1975). His interests are in constructed treatment wetland design, treatment facility design, water/wastewater infrastructure design, environmental permitting, and construction oversight.

Cynthia Murray-Gulde is a senior staff scientist for ENTRIX Inc. She received her M.S. degree in environmental science from the University of Houston (1997) and her Ph.D. in environmental toxicology from Clemson University (2002). Her interests are in aquatic toxicology, constructed wetlands, ecological risk assessment, water quality monitoring, biological sampling, and environmental database management.

Relatively large volumes of wastewater (0.5–3 million gallons per day [mgd]) are generated by coal-fired power plants through flue gas desulfurization (FGD). Through wet scrubbing of sulfur from atmospheric emissions, numerous other potentially problematic elements (e.g., Se, Hg, As, etc.) are entrained in the water. After the separation of gypsum, the residual wastewater contains relatively high levels (mg/L) of constituents that require treatment prior to the discharge to receiving aquatic systems. Based on information gained from comprehensive pilot-scale studies, wetland treatment systems were designed and constructed at power plants in North Carolina. Constructed treatment wetland systems were designed to target the removal of Se and Hg from FGD wastewater. The systems consisted of an upstream equalization (EQ) basin followed by three parallel surface-flow wetland treatment trains. Each treatment train consisted of four stages in a series, including two wetland cells planted with a bulrush, a rock cascade, and a wetland cell planted with cattails. The total surface area of the treatment systems was 12 ac, with a hydraulic retention time of approximately 7 days. Inflows during start-up conditions contained Se (38–634 µg/L), Hg (0.02–3.55 µg/L) and chlorides (503–2796 mg/L). The achieved start-up performance ranged from no measurable removal to 25% removal of Se and 88–91% for Hg. Studies are ongoing to improve the removal efficiency of selenium using constructed wetlands.